Classifieds    Cars  |  Jobs |  Real estate  |  Dating

News

WEATHER More Weather
Show the forecast for:
Thursday Rain Rain
9° / °
Friday Showers Showers
8° / 14°
Saturday F/Showers F/Showers
7° / 15°
Sunday Partly Cloudy Partly Cloudy
12° / 16°
advertisement

Will the "three strikes" policy reduce violent crime in New Zealand?

By MSN NZ
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Rethinking Crime and Punishment spokesman Kim Workman
Related articles

The Government's proposal for a "three strikes" sentencing policy, which would see repeat violent offenders who kill spend the rest of their life in prison, has sparked debate by political and social groups.

The policy, "Three Strikes and Max", outlines 36 offences that count as a "strike".

If an offender commits three “strikes” they face the possibility of being locked away in jail without any chance of release — on the third strike the judge will have to impose the maximum sentence for the crime and the offender will not be eligible for parole.

Sentences range from seven years to life imprisonment — for murder and manslaughter, the maximum is life imprisonment, sexual violation carries a maximum sentence of 20 years and for aggravated robbery, kidnapping and attempted murder it’s 14 years.

The new system would also require an increase in prison beds — an extra 56 prison beds after five years, increasing to 725 beds after 50 years.

Last year it cost $249.25 a day to keep a prisoner in New Zealand, compared to $9.92 a day to have a prisoner on a community-based sentence.

Rethinking Crime and Punishment spokesman Kim Workman told reporters yesterday that the new policy shifted the focus from the judiciary to the police.

"Under the proposed legislation, the police could, for example, lay a charge of assault with aggravated injury against an offender, which is a three strikes offence. They could then plea bargain with the offender, and reduce the charge to aggravated assault, which is not eligible, on condition that the offender pleaded guilty to the lesser charge," he said.

"Police 'overcharging' is a major issue in New Zealand, with around 10 percent of all charges laid by the police being subsequently withdrawn.

"Judges on the other hand, can only decline to sentence under the three strikes legislation, when it would be 'manifestly unjust' to do so. All the discretion lies with the police."

Mr Workman also warned of longer jail sentences.

"The longer you keep people in prison, the less likely they are to reform,” he said.

Do you agree with the government's "three strikes" policy? Or will it just create more overcrowding in prisons without reducing violent crime in this country? Have your say below.

User comments
Bring back the 'DEATH PENALTY'..its free..I would gladly flick the switch or open the hatch..Encourage Keys & his idiots to do a test run..the justice system here is a joke, in fact the whole of NZ is a joke!!!
Why wait till the third time to put them away, do we have to wait till someone is killed owing to the violence that they do before we put them away. The offenders are SUPPOSED to be ADULTS and as adults should they should be responsable for their actions. It is no good being mamby pamby with them so get rid of them so we can have a safer society to live in. Bring back capital punishment with avengence and more lives will be save and to hell with those who are no good to society by causing harm especially to young ones.
The reason for most almost all crimes is the level of poverty in the system, when there is low poverty there is low crime...its simple human nature. I like the 3 strikes policy..I do. I just hope when these people are sitting in jail they are being educated and inspired to be better people...of which the system on the outside never gave them. The system outside can give them this but there current social situation didn't allow this....change the social situation (in prison) to allow them to change.
We should save ourselves alot of money and just kill the serious offenders eg, murders,rape etc and take a leaf out of other countries who dont have prisions and see what there deterants to crime are. What about lableling them with a tattoo on thier forehead informing us what crime they have been convicted of. After all alot of serious offenders have had no respect for the people they have hurt or effected for the rest of their lives so why should we respect them. the sooner they are off this planet or live the rest of thier with some retrobution for what they have done the better.
HMM...THERE IS TOO MANY CRIMES SO I BELIEVE THAT WHAT EVER THE GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO DO OR ESTABLISH WILL NEVER WORK, BECAUSE THE END OF THIS AGE IS NEARING! NOT WORLD! BUT AGE! THIS IS ONE OF THE FIRST SIGNS - VIOLENCE, WAR AND LAWLESSNESS. I WON'T TELL YOU WHAT THAT MEANS, YOU CAN FIGURE THAT OUT YOURSELF!
another waste of time and effort to even implement this. I cant see why the justice system doesnt ship violent criminals and murderers (that without a doubt have been proven they killed) be sent to China or Indonesia or Thailand. The government seems keen for NZrs to lose their jobs to these countries why not pay them to get rid of our scum as well it would save us taxpayers having to foot the bill for prisoners that like going to jail to watch tv and eat good food and then let out to reoffend so they can go back. Our justice system is a joke and has a Oh you *** boy, dont do it again or else attitude. I also wonder about some of the lawyers acting on behalf of some the crims in this country or does our justice book need rewriting.
Who is going to pay for this? New Zealand justice is budget driven and therefore between tax cuts and the reintroduction of expensive privatised prisons the costs are going to be way beyond our capacity to pay. Obviously cuts are going to have to be made elsewhere and that is not in our collective interests. How about sending offenders to foreign work programmes i.e. building roads in Papua New Guinea? Or alternatively some could be sent into financially supported exile for a lengthy period of time - preferably somewhere they wouldn't want to be and where they would be subject to more rigorous legal systems. For example the dole would maintain someone quite adequately in Panama but if they misbehaved they would rue the day they went to a third world prison. Willin
when will we learn, how many times do you have to touch an eletric fence before you realise if you just simply flick the power off, no more pain. Common kiwis lets clean up our country and get rid of the human parasites holding us ransom. If we destroy convicted with out a doubt murderers we are saving lives, dont send them to prison it cost money??? Think!!! Hang them its free
The crims has to be caught first and with the present effort from the politicians (all parties) this law would be another wall paper. Our police force need more resources.
a man was killed by a peron with 2 convictions. had the 3 strikes been in place,the man would still be alive.punishment for crime is too lenient,we have to face facts, some people never learn basic good from bad,right from wrong and are better of removed from what yyou might loosely call normal society.

Write a comment
Email: *
Your email will not be shared with any third parties or published with your comment.
Nickname: *
Location: *

Subject:
*
Comment:
*
Maximum characters 1000

Comment guidelines
Avoid using:
  • Personal attacks
  • Irrelevant comments
  • HTML tags
  • Personal information
  • Offensive language
  • Text in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
See full comment guidelines
Comment guidelines X
Thank you for sharing your opinions with other users of NineMSN. People will find your comments more helpful if you include relevant information and avoid some common pitfalls.
Please note: All reviews and comments submitted are subject to moderation, NineMSN reserves the right to alter and / or remove any content that does not comply with usage guidelines.
What to include in your comment:
  • A title that briefly summarizes the opinion expressed in the comment.
  • Additional comments adding more detail.
  • Comparisons to other similar products, if this is relevant.
  • To create a new paragraph, press the Enter key twice.
What not to include:
  • Information that will quickly go out of date.
  • Comments on other comments or commenters.
  • Language that other users may find offensive.
  • comments of one sentence or less. Provide information to support your opinion.
  • Personal information like your email address or telephone number.
  • HTML coding. Tags like <b> or <i> will not be recognized.
Most popular videos
Jet Engine Explodes During FlightJet Engine Explodes During Flight Political Young GunsPolitical Young Guns England Wants Pakistan SuspensionEngland Wants Pakistan Suspension PM Blames Allan Hubbard For SCF CollapsePM Blames Allan Hubbard For SCF Collapse America's War In Iraq Offically OverAmerica's War In Iraq Offically Over
ALSO IN NEWS:
Random acid attack: drink this, pretty girl2010-09-02T16:00:00.0000000Random acid attack: drink this, pretty girlThe victim of an unprovoked acid attack in Canada would have been blinded had she not been wearing glasses she bought only an hour earlier. Wedding guest dies from salmonella in buffet2010-09-02T14:30:00.0000000Wedding guest dies from salmonella in buffetA British bride has been left "distraught" after her great aunt died and other wedding guests were left ill by food poisoning at the reception dinner. Pedophile 'knew who abducted Maddie'2010-09-02T12:00:00.0000000Pedophile 'knew who abducted Maddie'A British pedophile confessed that he knew what happened to Madeleine McCann before he died of cancer, it has been claimed. Gunman shot in Discovery Channel siege2010-09-02T07:30:00.0000000Gunman shot in Discovery Channel siegeA gunman fired several shots and took at least one person hostage early this morning at the Discovery Channel headquarters near Washington. Teen chopped up vicar after 'sex abuse'2010-09-01T15:00:00.0000000Teen chopped up vicar after 'sex abuse'A UK teenager drowned an 81-year-old vicar and chopped up his body because the man sexually abused him, a court has heard.